Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 17,245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 9:39 am
There are certain exceptions in which the statute of limitations in Arizona does not apply. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
First, to what extent does the gender gap in the profession persist? [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
by Dennis Crouch Earlier this week, the USPTO published updated examination guidelines regarding obviousness determinations under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 10:06 am
Full Chain of Priority: The problem for the patentee, is that the patent does not expressly spell-out the full chain of priority. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:58 am
Instead of 35%, those taxpayers will pay 39.6%. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
” JA134-35. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:41 pm
United Video Properties at *3-4.Prosecution History[The] examiner rejected a claim [in the ’128 patent] that included limitations for receiving “Internet delivered data” under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am
Impression had not sought permission to resell the cartridges in the US, and Lexmark subsequently took the company to court for patent infringement.Under 35 USC section 271, only the patent holder is authorized to sell and import patented inventions in the US. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:13 pm
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:28 pm
The amount of alimony ordered in Massachusetts is between 30% and 35% of the difference between the income of the recipient and the payor. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 11:37 am
Issuing bonds does not mean they are “free money”. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:57 pm
The mere fact that plaintiff uses the Brooklyn home of his sister and brother-in-law as a stopover for convenience and to sleep there when in the area on business, does not establish a residence. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:54 am
Reissue Patent RE40,449 (“the ’449 patent”) aredirected to patent-ineligible subject matter and are thusinvalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
[FN2]The instant claim does not require a different analysis. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:23 am
The article is inflammatory in my opinion and does not suggest how a "new" agency would operate or be funded. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:07 am
Second, the mere fact that the vibration damper module 1 is producing vibrations does not preclude some portion of it from being "influenced" by these vibrations as well. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
[FN2]The instant claim does not require a different analysis. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:51 am
The media "leak" does cause a little concern though. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:11 pm
” Nor does the specification expressly reference that term. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 12:14 am
This question probably took 35-45 minutes to write. [read post]
