Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 45,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
A Labor Department regulation that exempts those workers is binding, the Court ruled in Long Island Care at Home v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:38 pm
"A 'dangerous' driver is a 'dangerous' driver, whether he or she is a life-long resident of Virginia or simply passing through on his or her way to another state or country. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:46 pm
Today’s news about the case being brought by a number of Irish record companies against Eircom (the former State-owned telco and still a very significant player in voice, broadband and other services) is unexpected in terms of its timing, I suppose, but also long ‘overdue’ in that it has been discussed and wondered about for some time. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:01 pm
” The case is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Some of the fibers can fracture into long, thin fibrils. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 8:36 am
Beckon Employee Blogging Risks Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am
Accordingly, the Kremen case has long vexed the trespass to chattels jurisprudence by collapsing the distinction between intangibles and tangibles for property law purposes. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:50 am
Ever since the June 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am
“While we are glad to have achieved the core goal of our lawsuit, we remain concerned that Sheriff Doyle violated these state laws for so long and with so little transparency,” said Bennett. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 6:14 am
The court cited Muniz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
As in [DLLCA Section 18-302(e)], the use of ‘may’ in Section 25 indicates that an amendment is permitted (not mandated), so long as it is done in accordance with the MSO LLC Agreement’s terms. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Riegel v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:08 am
Ohio 2002), and whose former Chief Judge held design defect claims for a branded drug preempted four years before Bartlett in Longs v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 10:16 am
This Article was written and circulated for publication before the Court granted certiorari in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 8:12 am
Parmenter, 238 So.3d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA January 17, 2018) Non-resident parties can’t be pulled into Florida litigation if they don’t have the kind of “minimum contacts” with this state necessary to satisfy our long-arm statute requirements under F.S. 48.193, and the constitutional due process requirements articulated by our supreme court in Venetian Salami Co. v. [read post]
