Search for: "Robert Harding"
Results 4501 - 4520
of 7,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2008, 1:42 pm
Hard work was the only secret. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 5:53 am
Thus, throughout the Roaring Twenties, Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover adopted a hands-off approach toward big business, thus opening the door to a renewed wave of corporate mergers and higher concentrations of wealth See Part I (citing John Oller, White Shoe: How a New Breed of Wall Street Lawyers Changed Big Business and the American Century at 291 (2019)). [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Kimberley Fletcher on the occasion of the publication of her book “The Collision of Political and Legal Time: Foreign Affairs and the Supreme Court’s Transformation of Executive Authority” (Temple University Press, 2018, 296 pp., cloth: $99.50, paper: $39.95). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
One is that it means colorblindness, which is the Roberts position. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
Today in the Community we continue to disucss Sackett v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:27 am
SCt; she expects affirmance of court of appeals but the grounds could be better or worse.Panel discussion: Moderator: Jeremy Feigelson, Debevoise & PlimptonPanelists: Robert C. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 am
"Chief Justice Roberts filed an opinion concurring only in the judgment and saying in part:I agree with the Court that the viability line established by Roe and Casey should be discarded under a straightforward stare decisis analysis. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
How much, if any, civility to show when bombarded with that kind of rigidity is a hard question that I need to think more about. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:39 am
Even before the Roberts Court decided to take gerrymandering even less seriously, the only limits on gerrymandering were related to racially discriminatory district maps. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
In 1482, at a meeting of nobles who wanted to depose and hang James III's favourite, Robert Cochrane, Lord Gray remarked, Tis well said, but wha daur bell the cat? [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 8:12 am
" It's hard to imagine how controversial the VCR was in its day. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Robert Welch, the Supreme Court extended the restrictions on defamation liability first announced in NY Times v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
She said it was really women like Justice Ginsburg who paved the way so that by the time she got to the table it was not that hard. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Panelists included Robert Buckholz, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell; Lisa Fairfax, a professor at George Washington University Law School; and Monica Loseman, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.Salman: clarity on insider trading. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:07 pm
Roberts describes in her 2019 book, labor “under a number of different regimes, employment statuses, and workplace conditions around the world—often by design. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:14 pm
On the other hand, the White House’s furious denials that he cut the CDC are a bit hard to accept when he has repeatedly tried to do just that. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:11 am
Roberts, Jr. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
- Because of a Roberts Court opinion eliminating the requirement that federal judges evaluate constitutional questions first, qualified immunity permits ending litigation before novel rights claims, including the right to videotape the police, can be “clearly established” in federal courts across the country. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
Ct. 2653 (2011); (3) truthful off-label promotion provides valuable information to physicians and patients alike; (4) what FDA claims is “misbranding” is the same information it has pledged in other contexts to “work hard to address”; (5) Pacira’s speech is really on-label promotion that the FDA has attempted to suppress through an improperly crabbed reading of the drug’s intended use; (6) off-label use is legal, common-place, medically valuable, and… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
To date, however, Congress has not done so, and therefore it's hard to see how one could make an argument, consistent with the statutory text, for a categorical carve-out for some or all military policies.Yet to say that RFRA applies to the military is not to say how it applies. [read post]
