Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 4501 - 4520 of 5,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
He repeatedly uses terms like enlisting the state to “stamp out any subculture and make its members outcasts. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:51 am by Dan Bressler
” “Because of the undisclosed relationship, Hashagen was deprived of the right to a fundamentally fair trial that created a potential for bias, the appeals court said. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:37 am by Jeff Marshall
  It is also consistent with surveys of consumer preferences and with a 1999 United States Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Scott Harshbarger and Dennis Aftergut
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The Conduct Board found the Emerson chapter of Turning Point USA (TPUSA) responsible for violating the school's Bias Related Behavior policy. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
In the United States, the President awards the National Medal of Freedom. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
The motivation behind this is to reduce the bias of paid experts and better ensure that the analysis is as objective as it can be.[15] CAfA expert’s loyalty is to the arbitration panel and to the truth they uncover in their analysis. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]