Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 4501 - 4520 of 5,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by Minick Law
And sometime this evening, or maybe a couple of days from now, we will have a lot of new people in office, maybe some of the same. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
However, in Eldred v Ashcroft“The First Amendment securely protects the freedom to make – or decline to make – one’s own speech; it bears less heavily when speakers assert the right to make other people’s speeches. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
It “was left deliberately wide and open-ended” (Majrowski v Guy’s and Thomas’s NHS Trust [2006] ICR 1999 The conduct must cross “the boundary from the regrettable to the unacceptable” (ibid). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Excluding a class of people from that institution, therefore, can hardly be considered rational unless it furthers some substantial goal of the state. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
 Security company Mandiant published a report finding that the government of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) is sponsoring cyber-espionage to attack top U.S. companies. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), … [read post]