Search for: "United States v. California" Results 4501 - 4520 of 13,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 2:30 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the petitioner argues that under the Fourth Amendment, “[h]is general acquiescence to a search of his bag … did not extend to the destruction of his personal property,” the court could “bring greater clarity to one’s constitutional rights during a consensual search. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
The letter states: As Attorney General of the United States, I have a duty to defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
CALPERS: SECURITIES ACT STATUTE OF REPOSE NOT SUBJECT TO EQUITABLE TOLLING In California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am by Arina Shulga
   Some legal practitioners adopted a conservative attitude trying to fit the tokens of their clients within the tests provided by the 1946 SEC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
United States Socially Aware notes that changes to California law are increasing the visibility of consumer subscription policies. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Sean Cuff
Sept. 21, 2017), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint against Justin Samuel Cary (“Cary”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) (“§ 10b”) and Rules 10b-5(a) and 10b-5(c) promulgated thereunder. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:03 pm by Florian Mueller
This is a quick follow-up to last week's post on an amicus curiae brief by Lawyers for Civil Justice:Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has granted an Apple motion for relief from a non-dispositive order by Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins, who imposed sanctions on Apple for failure to timely provide documents sought by Qualcomm in its defense against the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust lawsuit. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Vacating the district court’s dismissal on the pleadings of a roustabout’s California wage and hour claims, the appeals court held that state wage and hour laws are adopted as surrogate federal law as long as they are “applicable and not inconsistent” with existing federal law and California’s minimum wage and overtime laws are not inconsistent with the FLSA (Newton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an infamously murky 2006 decision on Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]