Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 4501 - 4520 of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 am by Amy Howe
Last Monday’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:38 pm by Mark Bennett
Some members of the bar who represent clients facing criminal charges, in either state or federal court or both, may not be well versed in it. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 12:08 pm
A recent decision from the United Kingdom held that it is possible to defraud a machine, as well as a human being.The case is Renault UK Limited v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am by Matrix Law
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:51 pm by Edelboim Lieberman Revah PLLC
Under Subchapter V, the court may only require the appointment of a creditors’ committee “for cause. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The U.S. stands virtually alone, among constitutional democracies with well-established judicial review by independent courts, in providing neither for a retirement age nor for a limited term in office for its high court justices. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Brennan arrived after the Court’s landmark Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 12:07 pm
A practice of this sort would bring two separate benefits to the resolution of cases in the Supreme Court (and in other appellate courts as well). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 2:51 am by Scott Bomboy
Back in 2008, baseball fan and current Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito explained the unique circumstances in Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Rory Little
  A Court-watcher’s “inside baseball” tidbit Perhaps Justice Sotomayor should have silently left well enough alone. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
We begin this week’s edition with speculation about a possible shift in Supreme Court practice that may launch scrutiny of Supreme Court relists from its current tidal eddy of obscurity into . . . well, a slightly larger but equally obscure eddy. [read post]