Search for: "In re R. F." Results 4521 - 4540 of 10,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2017, 12:25 pm by Jim Walker
Now they’re paying $40 million for it (Miami Herald). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 1:55 pm by Joanna Herzik
Ford F-150 Mentors/heroes: My father and mother, Danny and Kathy Tower. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:47 am
There are legitimate uses for divulging personal data, such as life insurers who need to know about the people whose lives they’re underwriting. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by Viking
Mukasey, 540 F.3d 909, 910-11 (8th Cir. 2008) (noting Wikipedia’s acknowledgment that, "at any given moment," an entry "could be in the middle of a large edit or it could have been recently vandalized" (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)), and In re Marriage of Lamoure, 132 Cal. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:13 am by Stanley D. Radtke, Esq.
See In re Salazar-Regino, 23 I&N Dec. 223, (BIA 2002) (“[E]xcept in the Ninth Circuit, a first-time simple drug possession offense expunged under a state rehabilitative statute is a conviction under section 101(a)(48)(A) of the [INA]. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 11:03 pm by Joe Whitworth
Data were collected in a study on raw milk butter in Wallonia and the Scientific Committee was asked to re‐evaluate. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:31 am
"  As participants, a group of 268 (male) Harvard College sophomores, including John F. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:40 am by Nina Ferara (Porsche AG)
This can be done concurrently with re-sitting the failed papers M, but those papers will only be marked if the candidate passes paper F. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/502(f) But even a final order on distribution of property in an Illinois divorce can be appealed. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:00 am by Kevin
 That does seem like pretty good evidence, but since we're talking about Homeland Security here I would bring some other evidence along too. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:15 am by John Day
"  The court re-affirmed a prior holding that an expert's business records, files and 1099s should only be provided under "the most unusual or compelling circumstances. [read post]