Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 70,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 2:38 am
"The Board acknowledged that this is a close case. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 4:20 am
Summary The CJEU have not followed the AG in this case and have kept closer to previous case law on bad faith. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:16 pm
In the US District Court in Massachusetts, Assistant US Attorney Suzanne Sullivan is asking Judge Mark L. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 4:48 pm
Today also marks the end of my stint in the Lounge. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:52 pm
Carole Levitt and Mark Rosch, authors of The Lawyer's Guide to Fact-Finding on the Internet, have launched a newsletter to help lawyers locate information integral to their client's cases. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:40 pm
In this case, the Examining Attorney refused Applicant’s CANNIBAL mark for beer on 2(d) grounds and made this refusal final. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
In any case even weak marks are entitled to protection against the registration of confusingly similar marks for identical services.Finally, turning to applicant's "sophisticated customer" argument, the Board observed that its determination under Section 2(d) must be founded on consideration of the "least sophisticated purchaser" of the involved services. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
When the individual identified is famous or well-known, it is not necessary to show some connection between the goods or services involved and the individual.Particularly pertinent to the case at hand was In re Steak & Ale Rest. of Am., Inc., 185 U.S.P.Q. 447, 448 (T.T.A.B. 1975), in which the Board affirmed a Section 2(c) refusal of the mark PRINCE CHARLES for fresh and cooked meat, because the proposed mark identified a particular well-known living individual whose… [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:39 am
"In any case, the Board observed once again that each application for registration must be considered on its own merits. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 4:02 am
"This case is a cat fight. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 1:04 pm
The figures reported Wednesday by ADP Research Institute mark a disappointing departure ... [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 7:05 am
Select a jurisdiction by clicking “select courts” and then place a check mark next to the courts you would like to search. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:29 am
If that were the case, having a famous mark would entitle the owner to a right in gross, and that is against the principles of trademark law. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
“This is especially true in this case where Opposer’s marks are famous and they are accorded a greater scope of protection or exclusivity of use. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:11 pm
The recent case of Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:41 pm
This position on SCRs has been followed by Sir Mark’s successors, Sir Nicholas Wall P and, in turn, by me. [read post]
29 May 2011, 2:22 pm
My friend and co-author Mark Ramseyer's anthology, Corporate Law Stories, is now available as an eBook for Kindle. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm
The primary considerations in a written description analysis are factual and must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:30 am
The Board of Appeal’s decision The BoA dismissed the appeal (case R1839/2023-5). [read post]
