Search for: "People v. David" Results 4521 - 4540 of 6,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
By the way, the recording of Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence, High Court, Chancery Division, August 24, 2015 (our note) has been discovered, after so many people have requested it for so long. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Poppy Rimington-Pounder
The petition has even suggested that the uniform headscarf may have been introduced to deter Muslim female students from wearing headscarves altogether; head teacher David Burton has denied any such motive, and has pledged to discuss parents’ views with governors. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by New Books Script
51 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 28 from 2012: HJ 5316 E58 2011 Environmental taxation and climate change : achieving environmental sustainability through fiscal policy edited by Larry Kreiser, Julsuchada Sirisom, Hope Ashiabor, Janet E. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:21 am
Both sides emerged as both winners and losers (see PatLit here for a brief explanation and some idle speculation as to what the costs order might look like), and Class 99 waxed lyrical on the analogy between the design issues in this action and those in the 'pig fenders' case ( C & H Engineering v Klucznik [1992] FSR 421: as David Musker notes, "for pig read potato").So is there anything left for the IPKat? [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 3:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's decision by Judge David Herrera Urias in Leadership Institute v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am by Frank Ravitch
This overview shows that Kavanaugh is a thoughtful jurist when it comes to law and religion matters, although a significant number of people might disagree with some of his analysis. [read post]