Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 4521 - 4540 of 13,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Agyarko) v Secretary of state for the Home Department, heard 6-7 April 2016. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Can we think of info libertarianism as being sufficiently neutral as to all the things we care about w/r/t speech? [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
As found by the Federal Court in  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
Nixon (Nixon v United States) and President Fernando C. de Mello (De Mello v Speaker of the House of Representatives), but followed different paths: The Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed the political question doctrine whilst the Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal reaffirmed its alleged interpretive supremacy.Justice Paulo Brossard, in a passage from his dissent in De Mello, essayed a shared case law. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm by Giles Peaker
H & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Ealing London Borough Council [2016] EWHC 841 (Admin) Ealing’s allocation policy has already had lawfulness problems, compounded by Ealing’s unlawful refusal to do anything about that unlawfulness. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 19-20 January 2016. [read post]