Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 7,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2013, 4:56 am
SCOTUS Considers Scope of Preclusion of State Law Securities Fraud Class Actions Under Federal Law Here's news excerpted from this Simpson Thacher memo: Last week, on the first day of the new term, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
Coverage of the Supreme Court’s docket tends to focus on the blockbusters, and this month is no exception: last week the Court heard oral argument in McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:49 pm
Like Sotomayor, he expressed doubts about whether this case was any different from Washington v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm
As the Court heard the case of Schuette v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:10 pm
At precisely the time that Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:38 am
There is (according to the complaint in Broadcast Music, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 11:33 am
Chakrabarty, Myriad doubled down, and started suing people again on its patents. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
Lee v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
This is why many people who are not trained in the vagaries of the law hate it; how do you determine what's beneficial to the employer in those close cases, like Morton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
This is why many people who are not trained in the vagaries of the law hate it; how do you determine what's beneficial to the employer in those close cases, like Morton v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
So did Gardner v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
The case will be heard by an eight-member Court; Justice Elena Kagan is not taking part. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
Troice; Proskauer Rose LLP v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:29 am
The September 17, 2013 decision is People of the State of New York v Brian Novie, 2013 NY Slip Op 23315. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am
The Court returned to that topic Wednesday morning when it heard arguments in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm
A prime example of this struggle is the recent en banc decision of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in EEOC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Heard, and People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
We function through a government that provides total freedom for the minority to be heard, to dissent and to disagree, and to try to influence the collective thinking of the nation to make their minority view into a majority view. [read post]
