Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 4521 - 4540
of 47,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2025, 6:49 am
United States rejecting the use of obstruction of legal proceedings against January 6th defendants will potentially impact hundreds of cases.... [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
It’s interesting that the United States hasn’t relied on the Elections Clause in its defense of Sections 4(b) and 5. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 11:31 am
" Rowland v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 7:16 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
That brings us to United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
That brings us to United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:11 am
Nevertheless, Chief Justice Roberts has placed in the United States Reports an important enhancement of the distinction between matters of public and private concern that may lead to important new doctrinal developments in the area of personal privacy in the future. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
Two days later, Justice Scalia appeared in Durham for the United States Tax Court’s Judicial Conference, which was hosted at Duke Law School. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 11:54 am
United States and Kahn v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:00 am
Taylor, 535 U.S. 162, 166 (2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Paul Rothstein, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, addressed the use of hearsay in a criminal trial in his review of Ohio v Clark,* a decision recently handed down by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am
Texas and United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 4:21 am
United States, an important case about tribal sovereignty, with Matthew Fletcher(Michigan State University & Chief Justice of the Pokagon band of Potawatomi Indians Court of Appeals) & April Youpee-Roll (Munger Tolles & Olson), which may involve … Neil Gorsuch’s heel turn in Indian law?!? [read post]
