Search for: "David C "
Results 4541 - 4560
of 9,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2016, 10:24 pm
David Sparks also wrote about a new Anker charger that adds USB-C support. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:22 am
Bell, Fenwick & West LLP, on Tuesday, February 2, 2016 Tags: Board composition, Board declassification, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, Classified boards, Corporate governance, Diversity, Dual-class stock, Executive ownership, Majority voting, Outside directors, Public firms, Shareholder proposals, Surveys, Tech companies 2015 Year-End Securities Litigation Update Posted by Jonathan C. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
This weblog is a venture shared by the IPKat's friend David C. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:56 am
David may be charged with hindering a secured creditor. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
David may be charged with hindering a secured creditor. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
David W. [read post]
28 May 2015, 11:58 am
McCarron, Jr., Esq. | David DePietto | Carmel J. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
C-SPAN has video coverage, while Rick Hasen of Election Law Blog provides a brief synopsis. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:32 am
Foss, CEO, Aramark #30 Fred DeLuca, Co-Founder and President, Subway #29 Ben Silbermann, Founder and CEO, Pinterest #28 Dawn Sweeney, President and CEO, National Restaurant Association #27 Jim McGovern, Co-Chair, House Hunger Caucus #26 David C. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
Anderson, Barry Castleman, David C. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
(c) 1061? [read post]
Around the horn: climate double crossers, friends of coal waste, Smog Watch 2010 survey, and more...
4 Oct 2010, 7:50 am
The aides basically try to blame the White House for the debacle, singling out Chicago Mayoral candidate Rahm Emanuel and F-word spouting presidential adviser David Axelrod (who knew?) [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
David Post says pressing a button b/c it makes a funny sound isn’t authorship b/c authorship requires an awareness that a work is being created.Algorithms don’t work the same way computer generated art does. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 4:45 am
PARTIDO POPULAR DEMOCRÁTICO (David Bernier)Descarga el programa de gobierno (PDF) (P. 73) K. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Understand the frustration about infringement, but don’t take it out on educators just b/c DMCA allows them to do so. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
But (a) those articles post-dated the departure of the editor (Steve Gutkin, who left in 2010) who was allegedly responsible for the ban; (2) were not about NGO-related matters; and (c) cited Steinberg as a professor at Bar-Ilan University, without noting his affiliation with NGO Monitor. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:06 am
O'Brien (1968) holds that when the government is prosecuting symbolic speech, or combined speech/action, the underlying law must (a) further an important or substantial government interest (b) that is content-neutral; and (c) prohibit no more speech than is essential to further that interest. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am
There are a lot more such people among the young than among the old, and they are, for obvious reasons, much less likely to be attached to Israel; (c) despite the ever-increasing fraction of Pew Jews who are marginally affiliated, the 18-29s have the same rates of attachment to Israel as the 30-49s, suggesting, if anything, an increase in attachment to Israel among Jews who are active members of the Jewish community. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:22 am
If not that then, (a) no, I didn’t; (b) no, I’m not now; and (c) what I am saying is that when Republican Senators and their allies on the issue successively question the conservative bona fides of two Trump nominees who don’t fit the stereoptypical mold of a “conservative” while other “mold-fitting” nominees for similar positions haven’t faced similar scrutiny, it raises the question of whether the lack of mold-fit played a role in raising… [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
To the extent those opinions left some wiggle room by suggesting that stringent scrutiny of expert testimony by district courts was merely allowed rather than mandated,that wiggle room was eliminated by the 2000 amendments to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which now provides: A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or… [read post]
