Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 4541 - 4560 of 6,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present subject-matter does not involve a selection of that kind in an area which, although marked out by the state of the art, is nonetheless virgin territory.[13] However, the disclosure by description in a cited document of the starting substance as well as the reaction process is always prejudicial to novelty because those data unalterably establish the end product. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
" WMS Gaming, 184 F.3d at 1349 (citing In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526, 1545 (Fed. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:00 am by Max Factor
” Rojas v Superior Court (2004) 33 Cal. 4th 407, 415-416, citing Foxgate (emphasis added). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:49 am by Steve Hall
“An execution re-opens the emotional wounds of victim’s families and does not bring back or honor their loved one,” they said. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Appellee’s Br. 33-36 (citing ’298 patent figs.3 & 5; col.6 ll.65-67; col.7 ll.20-25). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Appellee’s Br. 33-36 (citing ’298 patent figs.3 & 5; col.6 ll.65-67; col.7 ll.20-25). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
Only a misconception of the scope of federal power can result from ignoring this fact, or from assuming that this aspect of our fundamental law does not exist. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:57 am
" Actually, '154 does solve its addressed problem. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
“The offer of real estate as such, without any collateral arrangements with the seller or others, does not involve the offer of a security. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 The shelf eligibility transaction requirements as re-proposed would require an ABS issuer to: 1. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
[M v Slough para 33] In that case, M, who needed a refrigerator for his medication and access to a doctor, did not need 'looking after. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by NL
[M v Slough para 33] In that case, M, who needed a refrigerator for his medication and access to a doctor, did not need 'looking after. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:02 am by Lovechilde
  Barry Harris has been described as a "hardcore bebopper" who "is great at what he does. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If you overwhelm it with new creative expression then you can still allow it to be seen—Naked Gun 33 1/3 case, Blanch v. [read post]