Search for: "Hill v. State" Results 4541 - 4560 of 5,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Professor Hill reported that a law cannot be changed, nor made inoperative, by withholding an appropriation that is needed for it to operate, so refusing to fund a program, agency, or department is unconstitutional. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
Supreme Court Uproots Weeds in Garden State’s Law of Expert Witnesses” (Aug. 8, 2018). 4 2018 WL 3636867, at *20 (citing the Reference Manual 3d ed., at 597-99). 5 Cook v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Where intention is clearly stated or evident, the analytical focus generally turns to whether the inchoate or unresolved aspects of the parties’ agreement are &ld [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm by Simon Gibbs
A recent article in the Law Society Gazette, from District Judge (and Regional Costs Judge) Hill, analysed the rights of audience of non-solicitor agents (see link). [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II Hargreaves v The District Probate Court [2022] EWHC 2605 (Ch) or, “What court would Jesus sue in? [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
§ § 14-2-309(a)(iii) and (v), was supported by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:26 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  It is not clear to me how one could teach certain major free speech cases, such as Brandenburg v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
He fails to note that the legislative change he thinks would be necessary already occurred in the EU with the introduction of Directive 2004/48/EC while in U.S. patent law it has been accepted since the 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account… [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:41 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
The Supreme Court has agreed with this numerous times, such as in Brandenburg v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:02 am
Hill delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]