Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 4541 - 4560 of 8,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2009, 5:21 am
But otherwise, wages are reported on a form W-2 and the regular rules apply. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:10 am by SHG
[W]omen are the seat of society’s survival. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:30 pm
It was not just that the matter was of "great importance to the country" in the abstract; it was of great importance in a particular lawyer-relevant way. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
“[W]e think it’s clear enough that the term ‘money’ excludes ‘stock,’ leaving no ambiguity for the agency to fill. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:54 am by Ronald Mann
That doesn’t seem like a retirement fund in people’s natural understanding of the language. [read post]
13 May 2016, 12:48 pm
The court goes on to explain that[t]he registration form states:6.) [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:32 pm by Russell Knight
The average person has a W-2 job, a retirement account, a house and a car. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
Maybe he couldn’t have done this on his own, but it was close enough that congressional authorization pushed it over the edge—which might not have worked for purely domestic subject matter. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Instead, as set forth by the First Circuit in Decotiis, several non-dispositive factors must be evaluated: [(1)] [W]hether the employee was commissioned or paid to make the speech in question; [(2)] the subject matter of the speech; [(3)] whether the speech was made up the chain of command; [(4)] whether the employee spoke at her place of employment; [(5)] whether the speech gave objective observers the impression that the employee represented the employer when she spoke (lending… [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  One may wonder whether Hamilton was sincere, but it really doesn’t matter. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
In the end, while the claim under Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation 2009 failed, the claim under Article 9(1)(b) succeeded as it didn’t matter that there was no confusion at the point of trade: what was decisive was that there was confusion pre-sale. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  The question presented in the case is "[w]hether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Itprovides that “[t]he Director shall prescribe regulations,”inter alia, “setting forth the standards for the showing ofsufficient grounds to institute . . . review,” and “establishingand governing inter partes review . . . and the relationshipof such review to other proceedings . . . . [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
(Matter of Congregation B’Nai Jonah v Kuriansky, 172 AD2d 35, 38-39 [3d Dept 1991]). [read post]