Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 4541 - 4560 of 7,376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
Arguably, this is the type of patent that the Justices of the Supreme Court had in contemplation when laying down the test in Warner-Lambert v Actavis[1]. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
The Justice Department said on Monday that it will ask the full 12-member Fourth Circuit Court to reconsider en banc the panel decision in Al-Marri v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:35 am by Jennifer Daskal
And it asks the court to require a comity analysis in such situations and to lay out the relevant factors to be considered. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am by Richard Hunt
This lays to rest arguments that Congress intended that private attorneys general would enforce the ADA and that such vigilantes therefore need not prove an injury. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
The court refused to impose vicarious liability for sexual abuse by a volunteer lay minister. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am by INFORRM
Discusses whether the super injunction has had its day, following the Queen’s Bench Division rulings in DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB), AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) and Gray v UVW [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB)  in which anonymity orders, rather than super injunctions, were made. [read post]