Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 14,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2010, 6:37 am
Strong v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
The Wall Street Journal tells us that the president’s plan faces strong opposition in Congress, led by Senator Marco Rubio. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:50 pm
Argueta v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 10:58 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In Fortgang v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
PharmaStem Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:11 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
In February 2011, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:20 am
The case, Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:38 pm
But if the 9th Circuit went to the trouble of certifying the question, and will now wait at least six months for an answer, it seems likely the state court’s decision will have a strong influence on the result. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
Further, Lord Clarke said that he would not limit the relevance of the merits to a case where that party had such a strong case that he was entitled to summary judgment, stating “it is almost always wrong in principle to disregard that underlying merits altogether as irrelevant” (at paragraph 75). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered: 1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am
It is black-letter law, under United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
Tambry and Suzanne were the lead plaintiffs in our case, Young v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
In Larson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Failed to comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical and Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education, 90 NY2d 364.In PCTEA v Buffalo, the Court of Appeals held that no strong public policy prohibits an appointing authority from agreeing through collective negotiations to give promotional preference to certain members on an eligible list where a probationary period precedes their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:50 pm
Lynch v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:21 am
Corbett v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
