Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 16,440
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2019, 9:14 am
Second, FDR was in as strong a political position as any President has ever been in the modern era. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court this morning rejected the claim of Russell Bucklew that his unusual medical condition required the state to execute him by the never-yet-used method of mitrogen hypoxia rather than the single-drug lethal injection method of a massive overdose of a barbiturate, the optimum widely-used method for most cases.Looking quickly over the opinion, it appears to be a strong reaffirmation of the decision four years ago in Glossip v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm
An illustration of this is the case of Kong v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Worse for Comphy, the court characterizes the Comphy word mark as descriptive and not commercially strong because the word mark isn’t heavily advertised to consumers. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
The facts of Murphy v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
See Sunbeam Prods. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
” This Strickland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am
They lay out concerns about current members of the White House staff in addition to Kushner, including questions about whether Trump’s second national security adviser, John Bolton, revealed on his security clearance application his work with Maria Butina (who pleaded guilty in December 2018 to conspiring with senior Russian official Alexander Torshin to infiltrate the conservative movement in the United States as an agent of the Russian government). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:55 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm
In R. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
I assume that it is not a coincidence that the cert grant happened shortly after the Court's decision in Timbs v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:37 pm
” The underlying case, Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 5:20 am
, Chandler v Cape plc [2012] EWCA Civ 525.Tort, however, can be understood in two senses here. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
In R v Belnavis the Supreme Court stated that “the reasons for this principle of deference are apparent and compelling. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 4:29 am
New York State? [read post]
