Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 11,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
* Cross-litigation on BIODERMA: different perspectives in national and Community proceedings Valentina writes about some cross-litigation concerning the ‘BIODERMA’ marks. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Mark A. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006) injunctions are not automatic anymore in the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:23 pm
Adidas is the owner of numerous U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
In Badgerow v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
From groundbreaking judges to passionate advocates, these individuals have left an indelible mark on history. [read post]
27 May 2007, 8:52 pm
" Id. at 211 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 3:30 pm
Co. v. 268 Ltd. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
”Carnegie Mellon U niv. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:59 am
U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:59 am
” * United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
” John Bennett in the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
It’s easy to see that an analysis of whether a long-standing mark is generic, and thus not protectable by U.S. trademark law, can be complex. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” At National Review, Mark Rienzi maintains that at the oral argument this week in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
Zuckerberg) Formerly Sealed Complaint (U.S. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:24 pm
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 23-24 (2005) (quoting United States v. [read post]
