Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 4541 - 4560 of 9,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
Verizon removed the cased to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
The fee office clause does not bar sharing state revenues with local governmental units in such ways, the Court explained. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cal. 2008) (“[F]or an inven-tion conceived outside the United States, the date of conception for purposes of priority for a United States patent is the date the invention is first reported to the inventor’s agent within the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:25 am by Andrew Frisch
  There was no dispute as to whether the Plaintiff had executed the arbitration agreement, containing the class waiver, however the court held that the class waiver was unenforceable, after a lengthy discussion of Second Circuit law and the impact of the recent United States Supreme Court case, Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Mark Ashton
Citing the Supreme Court of the United States ruling in Troxell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:08 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ConnecticutOpinion Date: 6/1/10Cite: Genworth Financial Wealth Mgmt., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Following an eight-day benchtrial, the United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Texas denied both parties’ claims. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has released an opinion disposing of summary judgment motions on a claim that a minority shareholder's sale of shares is a breach of fiduciary duties where that sale destroys the corporation's subchapter S tax status. [read post]