Search for: "Washington v. Downes"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 5,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
Supreme Court found in Staub v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
City of Richmond, 226 U.S. 137, 143–44 (1912); see also Washington ex rel. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks), (IPEG), (IP… [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
The parties debated them forcefully on the House and Senate floor, in state houses, and in campaigns up and down the ballot. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent … [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Box 38 Tupelo, MS 38802 Phone: (662) 844-5579 E-mail: dsanm@yahoogroups.com Gulf Coast Down Syndrome Society P.O. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger.Section 2(a) - deceptiveness:TTAB Chops Down Evasive "SILVER BIRCH" Applicant with Three Well-Aimed StrokesSection 2(a) - disparagement:Steve Baird Thinks the Washington Redskins Need a Re-BrandingBack to the Board: Is "REDSKINS" Disparaging or Not? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:32 pm
Especially because, and here we get to the point, the Court said in Reed v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
We refer of course to Courtney v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Supreme Court to reconsider in light of Carey v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
He did, however, deploy the U.S. military in Washington, D.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
The “mother case” is Marks v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am
” Andrew Jeong reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
That’s Washington v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
On October 8, the Washington Post reported that professors at the London School of Economics (LSE) accused the British Foreign Office of making foreign academics ineligible to advise the government. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 8:59 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
