Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 4561 - 4580 of 12,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
 Specifically, with respect to Count I, Defendants argue that tracking Troeckler’s vehicle did not constitute a private matter or private fact. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such affirmation shall be in substantially the following form:” I affirm this ___ day of ______, ____, under the penalties of perjury under the laws of New York, which may include a fine or imprisonment, that I am physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, that the foregoing is true, and I understand… [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:43 am
Plaintiff commenced this action in February 2003, and defendants thus met their burden of establishing that the statute of limitations, which began to run in October 1999, had expired.While New York does allow for some exceptions to the time limitations rule, they are not applicable in this type of matter. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
In a prior post I had discussed the need for speed sometimes in contacting an attorney. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
Joseph Kargbo, 2011KN087697, NYLJ 1202559252971, at *1 (Crim., KI, Decided June 6, 2012), a defendant, along with his co-defendant "doubled up" through a turnstile. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:24 pm by Ron Coleman
They call him “Tall Man” The court does not say so, but this defendant evidently goes by the nickname “Cleopatra. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Broca-Martinez, supra.The opinion then goes on to explain that [i]n United States v. [read post]