Search for: "Does 1 through 15" Results 4561 - 4580 of 13,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 11:01 am by Jeff Bastien
  As such, in considering the plaintiff’s entitlement to damages and the first part of the above test, the Court noted it was uncontested that the realization event occurred during the 15-month notice period and that the well-established purpose of damages in lieu of reasonable notice is to put the employee in the position they would have been in had they continued to work through to the end of the notice period. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am by Howard Knopf
 On occasion, a few tariffs have slipped through essentially, if not completely, unopposed because they were insufficiently commercially important to warrant even minimal opposition. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:49 pm
Meehan said, trying to avoid dragging any names through the mud. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/CASTLETON-BK-SD-IN-LORCH-9-30-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Absent exigent circumstances, stay imposed per Ch 15 is coterminous w/stay in corresponding foreign proceeding. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/DAEWOO-BK-SD-NY-LIFLAND-10-5-11.pdf … B-IA dismisses §548(a)(1)(B) cplt under Twiqbal based on failure to adequate plead insolvency, even if FRCP 9 inapplic.… [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Mendez, ____ F.3d ____, 2007 WL 2316498 (6th Cir., Aug. 15, 2007) to the contrary. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
In cases where the 60 day period does not apply, when SCI issues a report or, in the case of criminal charges, the employee notifies the DOE of the disposition of the criminal case pursuant to Chancellor's Regulation C-105, the DOE shall have 15 days to bring §3020-a charges against the employee or return the employee to his or her prior assignment. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In order to be considered comparable, DB plans must equal or exceed the benefits being offered through the ORPP. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  In 2005, this was through introduction of H.R. 2795. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 7:22 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
.,175 N.J. 309, 323 (2003), the Court held: "the ten-day provision does not preclude a continuance where fundamental fairness dictates allowing a defendant additional time. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:52 am
Code section 15-73-10(1) states that a seller of a defecive product "is subject to liability for physical harm caused . . . . [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am by John Elwood
But I have faith in the system and confidence that what the court does is for the best. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:42 am by Janene Marasciullo
  In addition, the loan forgiveness application requires borrowers to certify that the “dollar amount of the forgiveness” requested: (1) was used to pay authorized costs; (2) includes all applicable reductions due to decreases in the number of and/or compensation paid to full time employees; (3) does not include non-payroll costs in excess of 25%; and (4) does not exceed eight weeks of 2019 compensation, capped at $15,385 per individual. [read post]