Search for: "Gaines v. State" Results 4561 - 4580 of 9,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
A seismic shift in the state's civil litigation landscape was felt on June 28 when state Gov. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Mary B. McCord
Mary McCord is one of the counsel representing former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:16 am by Ezequiel Heffes
State and non-State fighters are indeed human beings, which makes it difficult to exclude an emotional component when assessing their respect for any legal regime [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:56 am by Susan Brenner
Code § 1030(c)(2)(A), unless the government proves that (I) the offense was committed for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain; (ii) the offense was committed in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any State; or (iii) the value of the information obtained exceeds $5,000. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:08 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia notes, “[i]n criminal law, . . . fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain”. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:03 am
§ 2255 in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
The Court has also explained how prospective profits, not prospective revenues, fall into that determination: The long-established rule in Wisconsin, stated in Buxbaum v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 pm by A. Brian Albritton
The Blog of Legal Times recently featured an interesting case where a District Court Judge refused after the trial of a False Claims Act ("FCA") case to impose the minimum $50.2 million Civil False Claims Act penalty on the grounds that the penalty was unconstitutionally excessive in violation of the 8th Amendment:  United States ex rel Kurt Bunk & Daniel Heuser v. [read post]