Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 6,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
I was born back in Brooklyn, New York, I mostly grew up in Pittsburgh, and my wife’s from the City of Chicago… and I’m here to tell you that if someone tried to pull something like that on someone else in any of those places back when we were kids, the offending party would pray for the dispute to be settled in a courtroom, you know what I’m saying here? [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
This case is about whether Sonia Jayne Goldstone (the wife) should receive from Sampson Robert Goldstone (the husband) a sum of around £4 million or one around £11 million (or something in between) by way of ancillary relief in divorce. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Just two weeks later, the wife filed her motion for temporary relief.[11] The husband then filed a motion to dismiss the action on the basis that the court did not have jurisdiction because the wife had not satisfied the residency requirement.[12] The trial court dismissed the action and denied the wife's subsequent motion to vacate the dismissal order. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:29 am
He also told [Khan] that `[t]hey gave [his wife] this because she's crazy,’ adding, `I don't want that, my wife is not crazy. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
The Court of Appeals found that the original judge’s denial of the wife’s motion to increase spousal support after her ex-husband’s death was not palpable error and concluded that there was no basis for the successor judge to reconsider the motion. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:11 am
A quick summary of Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, reported today:The facts: The parties were married in 1996, at which time the husband was the sole owner of a company. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:02 am
In that case, the court ruled that the husband had no “objective reasonable expectation” of privacy and, therefore, the wife’s accessing of his emails did not constitute an invasion of privacy. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:42 pm
Label v Label 2010 NY Slip Op 08903 Decided on November 30, 2010 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department held that the lower court properly awarded wife attorneys fees for husband’s appeal of the parties’ matrimonial matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:01 am
In the case of Barr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:01 am
In the case of Barr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:45 am
Thompson: The appellate court found the wife’s argument unpersuasive that the trial court placed too much emphasis on the fact that she stabbed the husband in front of the children, while placing too little emphasis on the fact that she had been the children’s primary caregiver and had been an excellent mother to them. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Finally, because Husband earns more than Wife and because Wife obtained permanent alimony, the Court of Appeals affirmed an award of attorney’s fees to Wife that amounted to almost 40% of Husband’s property division award!?! [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
This was done without his Wife’s knowledge. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
It involved a wife who learned that her husband was having an affair so she implored her daughter-in-law to access her husband’s email, who did so by changing the husband’s password. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:46 am
Maus has delayed decision on Methodist's petition until February 2d. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:20 am
On Monday’s Case Update I briefly mentioned a 12th District case, State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:56 pm
Sellers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
A wife could adopt a son to her husband but she could not do so during her husband's lifetime without his express consent. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:07 pm
The case continues as Stern v. [read post]
