Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 29,705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 8:11 am
Here are a few browser-clearing odds and ends that merit Grits readers' attention:Corruption alleged in UT-Dallas policing coursesFor years, reported the Dallas Morning News, UT-Dallas allowed police officers to enroll for a course, skip all their classes, and walk away with As. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
It’s the name, logo, slogan, etc. that you’re claiming as a trademark plus the product or service on which you’re using it. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:46 am
Readers of this blog may know that since 2014, Duke University Libraries have been hosting the Triangle Scholarly Communication Institute, in partnership with our colleagues at NC Central University, NC State University, and UNC-Chapel Hill, with financial support from the Andrew W. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 am
Below are the excerpts most relevant to Lawfare readers, organized by topic, in the order in which they were mentioned. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:33 am
Feeling snubbed, they're taking their toys and going home.When Austin's managed-assigned counsel system was created, attentive readers may recall, Grits opposed it and thought the county should have funded a public defender instead. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
As readers of this blog know, the soda tax has been the subject of posts since 2008. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:50 am
And in case you're wondering, initial long-term analysis shows the coin toss is tending towards ….Tails again! [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
This Kat is interested in readers views of HHJ Hacon's separation of "the inventive concept" from the "invention" (para. 222). [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 11:57 am
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 5:28 am
If there is a part that does not serve this overall goal, that part is probably useless or should be re-considered.So, you need to ask yourself: what questions do I need to answer in order to answer my key question and fulfil the aim of your research? [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 4:58 am
And if you’re not a constitutional cultist, what are you? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
My hope is that interested readers will find it easier to explore these contributions that might over wise have missed within the increasingly broad field. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
And, as for the rest of my readers, don’t let marinate. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 6:58 pm
RC: So, could you let our readers know about your views on the right to privacy? [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
In a recent interview, top IP executives from IBM explained their plans to demolish Alice by getting Congress to re-work Section 101 of the patent laws, which bars abstract patents. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
If you liked this post and want to know more about my work, please subscribe to the Carter Law Firm newsletter where I share behind-the-scenes information and readers get exclusive access to me. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Usually, after investors give a small amount and are paid, they re-invest more money. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:17 pm
It's all your're entitled to, and it's all you get. [read post]
