Search for: "People v Friend" Results 4561 - 4580 of 7,205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 12:01 am
Such policy views were themselves irrelevant.Thus, once again, I find myself defending a prominent Kennedy---this one fighting for his life---against an unfair charge by my friend Jeff Rosen.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
It seems to me that there must be a better expression to describe the latter (I'll try to find it as I write this) but the distinction between the lawyers who defend people because they have a passion for the fight (the criminal defense lawyers) and the lawyers who represent the accused because of a business decision (V-6s?) [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:31 am by Richard Renner
The Supreme Court got it right in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Will Baude
" This year's winner was my friend and co-author, and our co-conspirator, Stephen Sachs of Duke. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:20 pm
Almost 5 years out of school, every friend I have in insurance defense has yet to see 75 K. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:25 am by Eric Muller
(I should note (in the interests of full disclosure) that I am a friend of Greg's and that I read one of his chapters when the project was at an early stage of development.) [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:25 am by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
Communicable diseases, also defined by the State, include: “[v]iral hemorrhagic fevers, including, but not limited to, Ebola, Lassa, and Marburg viruses. [read post]
2 May 2008, 2:09 am
(For example, see his "Free Culture" book for self-criticism of the way he argued in Court the unsuccessful case of Eldred v Ashcroft.) [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
 He was therefore delighted when his old friend Tim Behean offered to pen a piece for this weblog which exceeded, in scope and vision, the bounds of what this Kat might himself have written.If you don't know Tim, you should make the effort. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:56 pm by kerry.sheehan
That in turn means that those rights holders are given greater control over how each of us consume media, use our devices, interact with our friends and family, spend our money, and live our lives. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by JB
He says that he and the people who agree with him have to accept Dred Scott as law with respect to the parties in the case, but that he will do what he can to change the decision-- and presumably he would continue to try to change it after he took the Article II oath of office as President. [read post]