Search for: "People v. New" Results 4561 - 4580 of 41,469
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Wade in the Dobbs case also presages a reversal of Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
US * New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post) * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Doe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Such an argument, made by Justices Black, Douglas, and Goldberg, didn't carry the day as to public official libel lawsuits in New York Times v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
The Marquette Law School poll, which was conducted just days after the court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:02 pm by Florian Mueller
So Google allows alternative payment methods only for the kinds of apps that account for less than a quarter of Google Play revenues.On iOS, the split is different: $32.8 billion for non-games (39%) v. $52.3 billion for games (61%).Google argues that its terms ensure its continued ability "to keep people safe on [Google's] platforms and invest in Android and Play for the benefit of the entire ecosystem. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Paul Rosenthal
          The Supreme Court had a recent opportunity to speak on this issue as part of last year’s significant ruling in Facebook v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:32 am by Andrew Koppelman
Pro-life and pro-choice people should be able to agree on policies that would actually reduce the abortion rate. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 9:25 am by Deborah J. Merritt
A new exam may address some of these flaws, but that exam won’t be ready until 2026. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:18 am by Eric Segall
This term's decisions on guns and abortion reinforce this thesis.Writing for the majority in New York Pistol and Rifle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
New York Times Co. v Sullivan and later libel cases do offer a defense for false speech about public people or entities—which Dominion may be held to be—if it was uttered without what the Court has characterized as “serious doubt” of its truth or a “high degree of awareness” of its probable falsity. [read post]