Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 4561 - 4580
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2009, 9:10 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977). [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
Stanley v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
For a discussion of some earlier court battles related to D'677, see an article by Christopher V. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:19 pm
Bank v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
| Friday FantasiesNever Too Late 160 [week ending Sunday 13 August] Scottish court “vaporized” trade mark invalidity appeal | Battle of the free trade mark databases – Global Brand Database versus TMview | An Improved Improver? [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Nevertheless, recognizing the conservative judiciary’s potential hostility to that distinction, the Article practices ideological jujitsu by redeploying Palmer v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 pm
Daimler and Nokia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
The Trunki caseThe key cases relevant to these questions were Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA Civ 936, in which it was held that a registered design based on a line drawing was for the shape alone, and Samsung v Apple [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, in which Apple had contended that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the simple line drawing of a tablet which they had registered as the design. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:28 am
Justice Demarest answered “yes” in a decision earlier this month, in Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50940(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County June 9, 2014]. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:45 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat) United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs) US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
Madison faced “an uphill battle. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 pm
/Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:44 am
(The Ninth Circuit reached a similar conclusion in the Doe v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
Indeed, Core has stated that it ‘expects to rely on Qualcomm source code for most, if not all, of the thirteen standard-essential patents asserted against LG. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
Caperton v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]
