Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 4561 - 4580 of 8,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Recent posts include a summary of Exxon Mobil Corporation v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:53 am by Jeremy Saland
In response, the court stated: “[W]e [] find that defendant was properly convicted of [F]orgery because his use of a fictitious name was for the purpose of misrepresentation and was ‘accompanied by a fraudulent design’ (People v.Briggins, 50 NY2d 302, 307 [1980]). [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Climate Report - The average temperature for the contiguous United States during April was 51.7°F, 0.7°F above the 20th century average. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:00 am
Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124, 136 (2d Cir. 1958), stating, At the same time, this requirement is not a demand for unreasonable precision. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
District Court Judge who has the case noted that [i]f convicted on count 1, [Glenn] faces a maximum penalty of ten years in federal prison. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:48 am by Dan Harris
This is completely optional, but it is important to state clearly whether or not you will be using this approach. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:34 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
PTO refused registration pursuant to Section 2(e)(1) of the United States Trademark Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]