Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 4561 - 4580 of 16,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2020, 11:26 am by Angela Mauroni
The appellants in this case also had to argue why the Fourth Circuit judges, G. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:10 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, No. 10-35175 (Aug. 1, 2011), in which a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit held that a property owner's inverse condemnation claim against the United States and the Bureau of Land Management was barred by sovereign immunity, and that similar claims against the State of Alaska could not be heard in federal court because of the 11th Amendment. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Except, on Friday, Judge Cathy Bissoon from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania concluded EEOC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:14 am
United States [Volokh Conspiracy] Carrington v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:09 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Judge Jackson rejected Craig’s defense that pursuant to jurisprudence in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:09 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Judge Jackson rejected Craig’s defense that pursuant to jurisprudence in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Additionally, the United States filed an amicus brief in the case. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:34 am by John Lewis and Joseph S. Persoff
We blogged about the new California legislation and the TRO issued in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
The United States then appealed the liability determination and damages award. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am by Florian Mueller
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
The Ninth Circuit also rejected the employer’s argument that its 1991 decision in Perugini v. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 9:41 am
The refinement of "reasonableness" review continues with the Sixth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]