Search for: "307 Inc" Results 441 - 460 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 466, 67 Division Street Amsterdam, NY 12010 Phone: (518) 842-3511 E-mail: ucp@superior.net Aspire of WNY 2356 North Forest Road Getzville, NY 14068 Phone: (716) 505-5500 Fax: (716) 505-5500 E-mail: info@aspirewny.org Web: http://www.aspirewny.org CP of Western New York's Children's Center 4635 Union Road Buffalo, NY 14225 Phone: (716) 633-9351 Cerebral Palsy of the North Country, Inc. 4 Commerce Lane Canton, NY 13617 Phone: (315) 379-9667 Fax: (315) 379 [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
In addition to ATRC, DiverseAbilities includes Hawaii Centers for Independent Living, United Cerebral Palsy Association, and Winners at Work, Inc DISABILITY ORGANIZATIONS Alzheimer's Association Web: http://www.alzhi.org Attention Deficit Disorder Kailua-Kona Satellite Kailua-Kona, HI Phone: (808) 898-0446 Autism Autism Society of Hawaii P.O. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
  While this pre-suit demand requirement is not quite as rigorous as the pre-suit demand requirement for derivative actions (see Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113 [1st Dept 2003]), at least a general allegation of a prior demand and refusal is required. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm by Orin Kerr
Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 312 (1978) (discussing historical background of Fourth Amendment and noting that “[a]gainst this background, it is untenable that the ban on warrantless searches was not intended to shield places of business”); United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:48 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Barlow’s Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 311 (1978), the Court began its analysis by agreeing with Bank of America's position that the OFCCP's desk audit amounted to an “administrative search” and that Fourth Amendment’s protections applied to this portion of the compliance review. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:39 am by Susan Brenner
The case is In re Grand Jury Subpoena (ABC, Inc.), 668 F.Supp.2d 307 (U.S. [read post]