Search for: "AS PTO, LLC" Results 441 - 460 of 1,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons' Den: where… [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984).In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, No. 2014-1301,Ejusdem generis is mentioned:The PTO contends the interpretative rule ofejusdem generis is inapplicable in this context. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * Bayer feels the pain: branded Naproxen can't invoke the territoriality principleKatfriend Marty Schwimmer reports on Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC, 1:14-cv-00847-GBL (EDVA Feb. 6, 2015), a recent US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruling that deals with Article 6bis of the Paris Convention in the US as it applies to Bayer’s trade mark ‘FLANAX’. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm by Dennis Crouch
However, the PTO’s “broadest reasonable interpretation” rule—like many of the PTO’s other regulations—is subject to challenge because the PTO was less than rigorous in following rulemaking procedure. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:28 pm by Daniel Yannuzzi
In this case, In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, the patentee challenged the PTO’s basis for instituting an IPR proceeding on several patent claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
 ******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 30 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners in Case… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm by Ron Coleman
Brand Named Beds, LLC, 500 F.Supp.2d 296, 317 (S.D.N.Y 2007) (just to pick a recent case from my neighborhood). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:14 pm by Ron Coleman
Frankly we would have relied on tackiness for the refusal if we were the PTO, because when we see this classy outfit we think “Chippendales” every time. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 7:50 am by Gregory B. Williams
., January 14, 2015), the Court denied related motions filed by defendants M&G USA Corporation and M&G Polymers USA, LLC (collectively “M&G”) seeking to stay the action pending the completion of the reexamination process of the patent-in-suit by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) and seeking relief from the final judgment previously entered against M&G, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]