Search for: "All Persons and Entities Claiming Any Interest in Subject Real Property" Results 441 - 460 of 674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
This language could be read as foreclosing all fraud prosecutions based on religious claims used to get contributions, even when the speaker is claiming that he has personally seen or done something, but it could also be the basis for drawing a historical claims vs. personal experience claims line. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
By contrast, automobile defects more invariably risk bodily injury and property damage. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
The SYLLABUS can be accessed HERE.With this post I continue to share with the class and interested "others" summary study notes for the course readings. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The Goodyear Dunlop precedent, the company contended, requires that an outside entity must be “essentially at home” in a place for it to be subject to lawsuit there. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
  It states: “the petitioner shall request a hearing within 90 days from the date of the filing the petition or shall be subject to dismissal on the court’s own motion or on the motion of any party interested in the action or proceeding. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  The SYLLABUS can be accessed HERE.With this post I continue to share with the class and interested "others" summary study notes for the course readings. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am by Venkat
This privilege exists where the statement involves the interest of the person making or republishing the statement. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:19 am by Jeffrey L. Rubinger
Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA), gain from the sale of U.S. real estate by a non-U.S. taxpayer is subject to U.S. federal income tax at graduated U.S. income tax rates applicable to U.S. persons. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Defendants assert thatbecause UUtah seeks the property of UMass, UMass isthe real party in interest, and that UUtah may not “pleadaround” the Supreme Court’s exclusive original jurisdictionover disputes between States.Thus, we must determine if UMass is a real party ininterest for purposes of the Supreme Court’s exclusivejurisdiction under § 1251(a). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:58 am by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
(6) "Interested party or person" means any person affected by a violation of this part or any person affected by an order of the enforcing authority [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Syllogistically, this suggests that protection of trademark interests can trump free speech rights, though then the question is, given that trademarks are intangible, is there a scope of these property rights that is entailed by the interface between property claims and free speech claims. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  Accordingly, the Court stated that “under the abuse of discretion standard set forth in section 21168.5, we will independently review claims of legal error and apply the substantial evidence standard to claims that [C]ARB committed factual error. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 This case was not an action that fit within the provision of CCP §39 “[f]or the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property” or “[f]or the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:08 pm by Michael Seay
  Owners of Rental Real Estate - Would allow landlords of commercial property to exclude from revenue receipts for reimbursement of ad valorem taxes and “any tax or excise tax imposed on rents. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
It claimed that it had a "reasonable apprehension" of Apple suing it, but the statement that Motorola enforced its SEPs "only in response to being sued itself by Apple" is, as it stands, wrong. [read post]