Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
It is appropriate that the Federal Government strengthen its efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions for its own employees. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
While there are many critical questions to ask about the specter of federal officers occupying an American city, senators should not lose sight of an issue lurking in the background—the fact that Wolf’s tenure as acting secretary violates the law. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am
One of the agencies, Catholic Social Services, sued, arguing that it has a free exercise right to do business with the city while continuing to discriminate against same-sex couples, whose marriage rights are protected by the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
Elsewhere in the United States, governments have faced similar choices between their obligation to respect the equal dignity of same-sex couples under Obergefell and their respect for the religious freedom claims of contracting placement agencies who refused to certify such couples as foster parents. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
Tom and Sarah detailed the reasoning behind high-profile rulings that: Extended federal workplace-discrimination protections to LGBTQ employees. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
In Dixon v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Plaintiff Bridge Aina Le’a, LLC, a landowner at the time of reversion, challenged the reversion’s legality and constitutionality in a state agency appeal, later filing suit in federal district court. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
Moreover, though the matter is not clear, federal law may often protect private employees who speak out in favor of a federal candidate. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
It is also manifest in the substance of his opinions, as evidenced by what he wrote in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am
” Robust contact tracing, testing and supported isolation (TTSI) across the nation will provide pandemic safety and get the United States economy back on track. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
By now, of course, the territory of the SAR is less important than is the idea of the territory of the SAR as a nodal point in the boundary making between the American and Chinese post global imperial orders. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
American Association of Political Consultants, No.19-631 (US Jul 6 202) the US Supreme court held that the exception for calls to collect government debt from a federal ban on robocalls to cellphones violated the First Amendment. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Although the United States suffered a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception—a federal law passed in 1873 restricted the sale and circulation of contraception among other “obscene” things—that era more or less ended in 1965 when the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
PACT allows court-order based takedowns under any federal criminal or civil law, or under state defamation law. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Murphy’s exemption leaves structures with fewer than four units unregulated. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:57 pm
The U.S. imposed sanctions on four Chinese officials under the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the American government to target foreign government officials implicated in human rights abuses. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 7:27 am
In 2015, Congress amended the robocall restriction and carved out calls made solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
The litigation continues, having survived a government motion to dismiss, which a federal judge denied on June 5 in Emami v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
The litigation continues, having survived a government motion to dismiss, which a federal judge denied on June 5 in Emami v. [read post]
