Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v." Results 441 - 460 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by GGCRBHS&M
The report indicates that 42% of  the State verdicts above $10 million were cases related to product liability (such as asbestos cases), worker/workplace negligence and construction accidents. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Del. 2006) (requiring showing of relative risk greater than two to support property damage claims based on unreasonable risks from asbestos insulation products). [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
Frederico and her husband brought suit in New Jersey Superior Court and subsequently amended the complaint to assert that Morgan Olson, LLC (“Morgan”) was liable under the doctrine of product-line successor liability because Morgan continued Grumman’s product line. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
S.C., 419 F.3d 568 (6th Cir. 2006) (finding plaintiff implanted with allegedly defective device had standing to pursue product liability claim based on theory of increased risk of harm, despite lack of present injury, and to seek medical monitoring remedy). [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:25 am
    What kind of product liability case is filed in California more often than any other? [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
"Products Liability is generally considered a strict liability offense. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am by Susan I. Nelson
Two, the court lifts a major corporation back on the hook for asbestos claims despite the mighty efforts of the Texas Civil Justice League, the Product Liability Advisory Council, and the Texas Attorney General's office. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In Owens Corning, the court found the securities class action – which alleged the company misrepresented its exposure to asbestos claims in its financial reports – did not “arise out of” asbestos, but rather out of the directors misleading investors regarding the company’s projected financial performance. [read post]