Search for: "B. Campbell" Results 441 - 460 of 1,265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  Neither do I ignore the ethical issues about the circumstances in which the information was received (although I suspect that this is intended to refer to surreptitious recording of information as in Campbell and Murray itself, rather than that the information was leaked). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:29 pm by James Yang
Campbell, the alleged infringer (Campbell Company) attempted to invalidate a patent via the first way under 35 USC 102(a)(1). [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court affirmed the district court’s judgment refusing to set aside the verdict (Campbell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:18 pm by Stephen Page
”Clause 3 provides:“(1)    If:(a)          before the recognition time, an order was made under Part VIII of the Family Law Act 1975 with respect to the maintenance of a party to a marriage; and(b)          the party later became a party to a pre-commencement same-sex marriage;                … [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:12 am by James Yang
  The CPC sections are: A: HUMAN NECESSITIES B: PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING C: CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY D: TEXTILES; PAPER E: FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS F: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING G: PHYSICS H: ELECTRICITY   You can find out more information about the CPC at the Patent Classification homepage. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
In relation to the claim under Art 9(2)(b), the judge concluded that even though the signs were similar and the services were similar or identical, there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
15 May 2018, 5:37 am by Colby Pastre
Key Findings State tax reform is a difficult process, but states like Utah, Indiana, and North Carolina, and the District of Columbia, illustrate that reform can be successful when it happens in a diligent and thoughtful way. [read post]