Search for: "Bader v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2019, 7:14 am by Jessica Litman
Jonathan Ellis argued for the United States, and agreed with Wall-Street.com’s interpretation. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices declined to decide whether Apprendi applies to criminal restitution – here, an order requiring two men to pay over $300,000 in restitution to CitiGroup. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm by Amy Howe
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at The Hill, Rachel VanLandingham urges the justices to review Larrabee v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.16 After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by NCC Staff
United States, and decided that Gordon Hirabayashi, a college student, was guilty of violating a curfew order. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
“[V]irtually all the state police … [and] also the local police … can get [the exemption] and the feds can’t. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States, or a corporation wholly owned by the Government of the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:25 am by Adam Feldman
The shortest first-day signed majority opinion over this period was the court’s 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Florida (Sotomayor dissenting, joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer; Breyer also dissented separately), Middleton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:38 am by Charlotte Garden
… The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States. [read post]