Search for: "Barrett v. Hand"
Results 441 - 460
of 523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair… [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:42 pm
DeLuca; Barrett v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
Barrett’s submissions”. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
In a sane world, a patent examiner would apply common sense and reject Securus’ application out of hand. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
As already, mentioned on 20 November 2015, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2015] EWCA Civ 1176). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Wash your hands and your children’s hands after handling animals. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Louis V. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:05 pm
” Justice Barrett went on to characterise Fairfax’s conduct after special leave was refused in June 2012, as “high-handed conduct by an organ of the mass media”. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
All eyes are on next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:01 pm
” She said that Washington state leads the nation in farmed shellfish acres, primarily because a significant portion of the tidelands is in private hands. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:34 am
North American Breweries, January 20, 2015, Barrett, M.). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Barrett) Ohio Northern University Claude W. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 4:49 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
Yeager v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
See, e.g., Garrison v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
Barrett’s opinion was not undermined during his lengthy cross-examination. [read post]
17 May 2014, 3:05 am
Of the handful of case names familiar to just about anyone with a reasonably full set of teeth, Brown v. [read post]
