Search for: "Bird v Bird" Results 441 - 460 of 1,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:34 pm by Coby Nixon
*Disclosure: My firm, Alston & Bird, represents Mohawk in these cases. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm by ernst
Strong v Bird (1874): Reassessing the RuleElizabeth Drummond14. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 7:24 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It has granted permission to appeal in the case of: Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Deutsche Bahn AG & Ors It has refused permission to appeal in the cases of: The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds v The Scottish Ministers & Ors (Scotland) Fowkes & Ors v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police & Ors R (Richards) v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police More details can be found here. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
On completion of the deal, he tweeted that “the bird is freed. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:00 pm
"   The court decided to construe it as an attempted claim against the animals mentioned, although that was likely because the court was dismissing anyway for lack of prosecution; plaintiff had taken no further action in the case and mail from the court was returned.Probably for that reason, there was no appeal, which probably greatly disappointed the Ninth Circuit.Link: Norman v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Bigger judgment, smaller royalty rate -the US courts make their mark onthe FRAND setting arms-raceHaving digested the Unwired Planet judgment one too many times, the AmeriKat was relieved that longtime Kat friend Richard Vary (Bird & Bird) volunteered to devour the epic FRAND judgment from California that was recently delivered in the TCL v Ericsson battle. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:21 pm
For reasons that are not at all surprising given both the nature of this institution as well as the facts underlying the sentence.This is not to assert, by the way, that the California Supreme Court in the post-Bird era is totally incapable of exercising detached legal judgment in death penalty cases. [read post]