Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 441 - 460 of 16,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.An investment adviser and its co-owners were let off the hook for receiving undisclosed servicing fee payments tied to particular mutual funds. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division remitted the matter to the arbitrator to determine whether charge 1 and any of the allegations under charge 2 were timely, i.e., "whether [Corrections] proved at the hearing that [CO's] conduct would constitute the crime of official misconduct" within the meaning of the State's Penal Law §195.00. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division remitted the matter to the arbitrator to determine whether charge 1 and any of the allegations under charge 2 were timely, i.e., "whether [Corrections] proved at the hearing that [CO's] conduct would constitute the crime of official misconduct" within the meaning of the State's Penal Law §195.00. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 11:14 am by Matthias Weller
      Point 1(a) of Article 7 of Regulation No 1215/2012 must be interpreted as meaning that, where the designated use of immovable property subject to co-ownership provided for by a co-ownership agreement cannot be relied upon erga omnes, an action by which a co-owner of immovable property seeks to prohibit another co-owner of that property from carrying out changes, arbitrarily and without the… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:05 am
Giving an employee a “warning” is not an adverse personnel action within the meaning of New York’s Human Rights LawCarter v NYC Dept. of Corrections, CA2, 7 Fed. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:21 am
Co., the Court stated “the meaning of a provision is not discerned by reading it in isolation, but by recognizing its relation to the other terms of complete contractual relationship. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 2:45 am
Each application, or any group co-pending of "indistinct applications" to one invention, is subject to 5/25 claims requirement.#2. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
. #1: It Is Now Clear That “(State) Legislature” in the Constitution Doesn’t Always Mean Elected Legislature, and Doesn’t Mean Elected Legislature When It Refers to the Power to Pass State Laws The Elections Clause of the Constitution, Article I, section 4—the provision on which the elected Arizona legislature relied—reads: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in… [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm by Bona Law PC
These requirements, in fact, first appeared in a 1977 case called Metro SB-Großmärkte GmbH & Co. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 3:01 am
In a mere six-page opinion, the Board swatted away this appeal from a refusal to register the mark SKEETER BAND for "mosquito repellent bracelets," finding the mark merely descriptive of the goods under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 11:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State . . . . [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:27 pm
Finally, the complete invention of claim 11 included all of the features of claims 1, 5, and 6, from which that claim depended. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:24 am by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (7/14/11) 197 Cal.App.4th 640, the plaintiff in a discrimination and wrongful termination action sought detailed information regarding certain of his former co-workers, including: (a) The names of all employees terminated during a two-year period, November 1, 2008 to June 28, 2010. [read post]