Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 12,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 7:29 am
The United State Supreme Court disagreed, holding the plain language of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 8:36 am
United Spinal Association, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:14 am
” (California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:51 am
Last Monday, January 14th, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the Preston v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:53 am
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:27 am
See, Ayala v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:51 am
In a major victory for employees, the United States Supreme Court has denied Ralphs’ Petition for Certiorari in Brown v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:09 am
United States (293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:51 am
Almost immediately, the law was challenged in court, in a case called United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:51 am
Almost immediately, the law was challenged in court, in a case called United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:11 pm
For those keeping track of such things, United States District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel (Northern District of California) found "reasonable attorneys fees based on rates of $650 for partner services, $500 for associate attorney services and $150 for paralegal services. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:50 pm
In Beckwith v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:20 pm
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:21 am
Perry, the challenge to California's Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:16 am
On January 21, 2010, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a ruling in Big Baboon, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 6:15 am
State of California: Pauma Cert Petn Question presented: One of the statutory elements for establishing a prima facie case of bad faith negotiation against a state under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 4:52 pm
On April 6, 2017, the California Supreme Court struck another blow in its contentious battle with the United States Supreme Court on the enforceability of consumer arbitration clauses subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
I have now had a chance to review the transcript in United States v. [read post]
