Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
The plaintiffs, whom the court will collectively call `Music Group,’ filed this case against John Doe defendants in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
On Monday, October 31, 2011 (hello, Halloween), the United States Supreme Court issued the following Order: 10-1450 SONIC-CALABASAS A, INC. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:36 pm
Oral arguments were held December 7, 2011 at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:13 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:09 pm
” The decision is consistent with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Kearney v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
California, 509 U.S. 764, 794-99, 113 S.Ct. 2891, 125 L.Ed.2d 612 (1993). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:05 pm
California, 509 U.S. 764, 794-99, 113 S.Ct. 2891, 125 L.Ed.2d 612 (1993). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:17 am
Arthur-Price v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Davis, No. 09-99005 (per curiam; panel is Reinhardt, Wardlaw, and Callahan) --- On remand from the United States Supreme Court, see Davis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:57 pm
NCIS, 3:10-cv-01879-WQH -AJB, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, sets 9 November as the deadline for the defendants’ answer. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:21 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:27 am
United Airlines (“Ward”) and Oman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Draper proposes that the voters of the state adopt a measure that would: (1) “[e]stablish new boundaries for three new states within the boundaries of the [current] State of California; (2) [e]stablish a procedure for the transformation of the single State of California into three new states; and (3) [p]rovide the legislative consent for the formation of three new states to Congress as required by the Constitution of the… [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:47 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
