Search for: "Chambers v. Brown*" Results 441 - 460 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
The question for the Supreme Court in Re McCaughey was whether, as a result of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Silih v Slovenia [2009] ECHR 571, the Supreme Court ought to overrule the decision of the House of Lords in McKerr [2004] 1 WLR 807 that Article 2 applied, by virtue of the Human Rights Act 1998, only to deaths occurring after 2 October 2000. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 pm by Erin Miller
On two occasions, at the start and end of our work, we interviewed Justice Stevens briefly in his chambers, where he shared a few anecdotes. [read post]
On 4 March 2020, the Court of Cassation (Labour Chamber) ruled on Uber drivers’ employment status. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am by Victoria Kwan
The next day, he discussed the Constitution and Brown v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 10:21 am
There's a provocative piece on the jiplp weblog, "Premier League v QC Leisure: an opinion about an opinion -- what's your opinion? [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm by Guest Author
Rejecting the originalist and structural arguments against the legislative veto that the Supreme Court offered in INS v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 11:25 am by Lyle Denniston
Instead, everyone directly involved will start by focusing on a case named Weyerhauser Co. v. [read post]