Search for: "Cohen v. Williams"
Results 441 - 460
of 499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
Clarke's Mysterious WorldRoxy Music – AvalonLangston Hughes – Ballad of the GypsySerge Gainsbourg – BaudelaireDavid Linx – Becoming StreamsThe Divine Comedy – Bernice Bobs Her HairBon Iver – Beth/Rest - Rare Book RoomJay Farrar – Big SurMorrissey – Billy BuddThe Decemberists – Billy LiarSmooth Toad – Bixby CanyonDeath Cab for Cutie – Bixby Canyon BridgeBilly Bragg – Blake's JerusalemBlossom Dearie –… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
Clarke's Mysterious WorldRoxy Music – AvalonLangston Hughes – Ballad of the GypsySerge Gainsbourg – BaudelaireDavid Linx – Becoming StreamsThe Divine Comedy – Bernice Bobs Her HairBon Iver – Beth/Rest - Rare Book RoomJay Farrar – Big SurMorrissey – Billy BuddThe Decemberists – Billy LiarSmooth Toad – Bixby CanyonDeath Cab for Cutie – Bixby Canyon BridgeBilly Bragg – Blake's JerusalemBlossom Dearie –… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
Jordan Williams reports for The Hill. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
It is usually a happy coincidence when my two professional roles—constitutional scholar/teacher and academic administrator—come together in a work task. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Chandler WL, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Ciol MA, Williams GD, Watkins SL, Igarashi T, and Tarr PI. (2002). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
As the vote tallies for the November 2018 federal elections become finalized, one seat in the House of Representatives may not be resolved for several weeks because of an unusual lawsuit filed by Republican incumbent Bruce Poliquin (along with three Republican voters) in Maine. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Chandler WL, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Ciol MA, Williams GD, Watkins SL, Igarashi T, and Tarr PI. (2002). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
My biweekly column slot this week roughly coincides with the beginning of the new academic year at most law schools across the country. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Chandler WL, Jelacic S, Boster DR, Ciol MA, Williams GD, Watkins SL, Igarashi T, and Tarr PI. (2002). [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Silicon Valley billionaire investor Tim Draper recently unveiled a plan to divide up California into six separate states because, in his view, “California’s diverse population and economies [have] rendered the state nearly ungovernable. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
June 2019 might become known in Illinois as the month the state legalized marijuana use, but I hope it remains better remembered as the 100th anniversary of Illinois’ ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment—the provision in the Constitution that prohibited discrimination in voting on account of sex. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
