Search for: "Com. v. May" Results 441 - 460 of 3,206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
Nor is there any guidance in the CJEU decision in Huawei v ZTE (ECU:EU:C.2015 - 477) nor in the Guidance issued by the European Commission (CoM [2017] 712 final 29.11.2017). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Typically, such officers may be removed from office for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversion in office by the filing of an application for such removal with the Appellate Division have jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Typically, such officers may be removed from office for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversion in office by the filing of an application for such removal with the Appellate Division have jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A possible defense for board members may be the ‘business judgment rule’. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
Para tanto, em 21/11/2018, foi publicado o Decreto nº 9.571, que estabelece as Diretrizes Nacionais sobre Empresas e Direitos Humanos para médias e grandes empresas, incluídas as empresas multinacionais com atividades no país [2]. [read post]
“Common Sense” Exemption – Under the Final Text, the “general rule” that an activity is exempt from CEQA if there is no possibility that activity may have a significant effect on the environment is now referred to as the “common sense” exemption to match the language used by the California Supreme Court.[12] <Judicial Remedies – Relying on several CEQA cases,[13] the Final Text emphasizes that courts have the equitable discretion to void… [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:42 am by Eric Goldman
Internet Brands * Online Dating Websites Aren’t Required To Warn That Some Members May Be Murderers (Forbes Cross-Post) [read post]