Search for: "Counsels and Agents of Defendants" Results 441 - 460 of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2020, 2:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Google’s counsel responded stating: “I am not aware. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:25 am
Schmid, the attorneys were addressing unresolved discovery issues and it was allegedly agreed that defendants would produce certain documents within 45 days or suffer an "order of preclusion" -- that is, the defendants would be unable to introduce those documents at a hearing or trial and would be hindered in presenting a defense or proving any counterclaims they had in the case.When motion practice later ensued (based on the… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:12 am
February 28, 2011).* Defendant’s § 2255 argument that his defense counsel failed to renew his Fourth Amendment challenges is moot because the Fourth Amendment challenges were appealed. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 12:58 pm by Robert Dietrick
Lechner, the Government charged that the defendant failed to appropriately store explosives. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 5:37 am by Staci Zaretsky
* Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is a little worried about President Trump's flair for hyperbole, saying that Trump should never "walk into that room with" special counsel Robert Mueller, because when you make "false statements to federal agents, that's a crime, that can send you to jail. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
The defendants are also charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
Instead, the court must look to agency law to determine whether Shiboleth had the authority to bind the defendants to the agreement. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:19 am by William McGrath
" The defendants argued that the defendants were actually in competition and odds with each other, which did not support the Government's argument that a single conspiracy existed, especially one with a Government agent or informant at the "hub. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 1:53 pm
If Defendant is arguing on appeal that his trial counsel's mention of "an additional Miranda issue" in the context of his arguments below raised a separate state constitutional argument that the agents were obligated to inform him that he had a right not to cooperate with them, his argument is an unreasonable stretch of the district court record. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:52 pm
"FBI agents swarmed onto my property and surrounded my entire home in bulletproof vests and night vision goggles. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:42 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Exhibit A, the opposition to the motion to file under seal indicates, includes Defendant LtCol Sean Sullivan’s declaration concerning “two subjects: (1) a general description of the contents of the Law Center at the Marine Corps Recruit Depot (“MCRD”) San Diego and (2) statements that Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents and an Assistant United States Attorney informed Sullivan that Plaintiff is under criminal investigation. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:20 am by Jeff Gamso
As one of my colleagues commented, the warning sounded so avuncular, you just about expected the agent to put his arm around the prospective defendant's shoulders. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:52 am
This set of circumstances gave Cheryl Shelton authority to search the home and seize evidence from it--whether she acted as an agent of the government or for her own reasons. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm by Bill Otis
  But for as discomfiting as the revelations about Agent Strzok are (emphasis added)... it gets worse. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 8:07 pm
Additionally, the defendants must pay class counsel a maximum amount of $1,750,000. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:46 am
The estate is not prejudiced because the letters are limited to defending against the negligence action to the extent that the defense and payment are covered by the terms of the insurance policy. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm
But what about the other defendants in the case? [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:48 am by Matthew Kahn
  Those charges are still pending and the defendants remain at large. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Shamnad Basheer
 SPEAK is represented by Swathi Sukumar, an IP counsel and director of i-Probono and Mr Chander Uday Singh, a senior counsel. [read post]