Search for: "Cross v. Bear"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,063
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2020, 2:49 pm
Does it mean you no longer have the right to cross-examine her at trial? [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (SCOPA), recently issued its opinion in Carr v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
While a substantial and complex body of case law has developed under RICO, the following are the main issues that bear on the viability of such a claim against the lawyers and medical professionals who are responsible for allegedly bogus claims, such as were seen in the Silica MDL: The existence of repeated instances of the misconduct on which the RICO claim is predicated; A showing that there has been a pattern or practice of such misconduct; Proof that a person has conducted the affairs… [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:16 am
Second, in Pearson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Expert witness opinions about the nature and cause of plaintiffs’ medical conditions, are the linchpin of mass tort cases involving claims of bodily injury from allegedly harmful products. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Like the covert shifting of the burden of proof, or the glib assessment that the loser can still cross-examine in front of the jury,[14] the rulings discussed represent another way that judges kick the can on Rule 702 motions. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:27 am
LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:27 am
Compulife Software Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am
Two Commons Committees –the Home Affairs Committee and the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee – have recently held evidence sessions with government Ministers discussing, among other things, the government’s proposed Online Harms legislation. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:27 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Circuit pointedly observed in its seminal decision in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
Supp. 3d 486, 503-04 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (“The party seeking to introduce the expert testimony bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the proffered testimony is admissible. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:39 am
In Affainie v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:12 am
Posted by Edmund R. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:37 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
" White v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 9:34 am
[Citing Malloy v. [read post]
