Search for: "DOES 1-68"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Table 1. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:38 am
It stated that the report “does not categorically rule out the existence of marks similar or identical to the contested mark” and that “the applicant’s alleged diligence cannot be proven” (paragraph 60). [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
A: The President does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
It does not take a Ph. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:57 am
§ 68, to recover damages for infringement of four United States patents. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:05 am
" Let me save you the effort: I have downloaded the entire 68-page article at that link, and have read it all the way through. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
It does not take a Ph. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Nor does it incorporate state administrative penalties, such [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:55 pm
The number of ill persons identified in each state with the outbreak strain was as follows: Texas (43), Oklahoma (16), Kansas (2), Iowa (1), Michigan (1), Missouri (1), Nebraska (1), New Mexico (1), Ohio (1), and Tennessee (1). [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:37 am
“Just because the case is large, does not mean the case should be viewed as a blank check for professionals. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 8:31 am
Investing Co., Inc., No. 60 "A property owner is liable for a violation of Labor Law section 240(1) which proximately caused injury to a worker, even though a tenant of the building contracted for the work without the owner's knowledge. [read post]
5 May 2016, 3:40 am
Robenstein, 68 A.D.3d 1179 (3rd Dept., 2009). [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
The number of Secrecy Orders issued in FY '08 are shown (parenthetical values reflect change relative to FY '07 data) (source: FAS): Total Secrecy Orders in Effect FY08: 5,023 (-21) New Secrecy Orders Imposed: 68 (-60) ARMY: 8 (-14) NAVY: 8 (-20) AF: 20 (-25) NSA: 20 (-1) Secrecy Orders Rescinded: 47 (-21) "John… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am
Further reading: Why Does Business (Usually) Win in the Roberts Court? [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
Nelson (1969) 1 Cal. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:53 am
Bad stuff.I’m pleased to say that my friend and former Arkansas state Representative Dan Greenberg — who’s now with the Advance Arkansas Institute — tried to fight this bill; and after his input, the House did pass it only by a vote of 68–19, with 11 not voting and 1 “present,” while before his input the Senate passed it unanimously. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Thus, the foregoing response does not constitute legal advice nor a definitive response to the question presented. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 4:05 pm
This does not mean the threat to democracy is coming to an end. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:10 am
Super. 461, 467-68 (App. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:59 pm
No.s 1-39 are here. 40. [read post]
